Project Management Software

PMs in this category often plan and schedule with only durations rather than work estimates and resource capacity.  Many times these PMs have no need to develop or track a project budget because status reports are limited to completion date tracking. At this level, the organization usually does not consolidate or "roll-up" all of the projects in the portfolio nor does it manage the overall utilization of the people who work on projects.    

In this situation, your range of choices is very broad and many packages will meet these limited needs with Gantt and PERT charts. If this is all you want, there is not much sense in spending more than $25 nor investing in  a long learning curve that covers a lot of features you will never use.  On the other hand, if you or your organization intend to move toward the greater precision of work estimate-based project plans and portfolio management then learning the basic packages will prove to be a dead end and you are better off buying and learning a more sophisticated tool into which you and the organization can grow.

At this level, project managers who want to automate the process of laying out plans, preparing occasional status reports and producing some simple Gantt and PERT charts, the low end PM software tools are just fine. Without investing the time to master the more sophisticated tools, there are plenty of packages that will automate the basics for you. There are also a host of web-based products that operate at this capability level.  For under $125 there are products like: TurboProject, Milestone Simplicity, Quick Gantt. Most computer and business supply stores carry these less expensive products.  If you think you'll be managing larger projects in the future, then Microsoft Project 2003 or Primavera's SureTrak may be a better choice as a starting point.

As the scale of projects grows and their impact reaches beyond one functional unit, the demands on the PM's techniques grow as does the required capability of the PM software tool they need.  Rather than working with PM software that is a static representation of start and finish dates, we move up to software tools that simulate the project and that reschedule and optimize it every time we make a change. Budget is now an important issue in planning and tracking.  Accordingly, we build project plans based on the estimated hours of work and predecessor relationships, not just start and finish dates that are "plucked from the sky."  We require software that gives us the capability to budget and schedule not only internal employees but also external consultants and vendors as well as equipment and travel expenses.  Because PMs working at this level of complexity are building more precise work-based plans, the software should provide more sophisticated earned value reporting, slack and delay reports for fine tuning as well as the usual critical path and resource level capability.

The software cost takes quite a jump in price to the $300-$500 level and the learning curve for these software tools are much steeper than the first level. The big market shares belong to Microsoft Project 2002-2003 and Primavera products.

At the high-end are PMs managing multiple projects or operating in a mature project organization where resource utilization is managed across all projects, as opposed to the typical resource "free for all," and there are executives with accountability for portfolios of projects.  Here we need project management protocols to bring consistency to project planning and tracking (see our 4PM section).  While software never ensures a consistent PM process, despite all the people who think it can, this environment adds to the requirements of the previous levels.  We now have the need to consolidate (roll-up) multiple projects and provide consistent information so decision-makers can prioritize projects, allocate resources and schedule and track a pool of people working on multiple projects. This process is a lot more complicated than it sounds. It requires organization processes for portfolio management and software that can identify conflicting demands for the same resources as well as allow the executives to set priorities among projects that require the same resource. This category of user also generally wants to create detailed project budgets and have the software come pretty close to mimicking the company's cost accounting system. But they want actual cost data a lot sooner than the accounting department provides it. In this category, users often want sophisticated risk assessment tools, learning curve and resource loading features as well as detailed performance tracking.